Mexico City, June 15: A fresh controversy has emerged around the 2026 FIFA World Cup after Jibril Rajoub, president of the Palestinian Football Association, claimed that both the United States and Canada denied him entry visas, leaving him stranded in Mexico City despite holding FIFA accreditation. Rajoub argues that football officials invited to World Cup events should be granted access regardless of nationality, raising concerns about the treatment of international delegates.
The dispute has intensified debate over the responsibilities of World Cup host nations. Rajoub accused the host countries of failing to uphold the spirit of FIFA's global inclusivity, while FIFA has maintained that immigration decisions ultimately remain under the authority of national governments. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has acknowledged the issue but indicated that the organization cannot override sovereign visa policies.
Reports suggest that the visa controversy extends beyond the Palestinian delegation. Officials and football personnel from countries including Iran, Iraq and Somalia have reportedly faced entry difficulties linked to security reviews and immigration restrictions. The case of Somali referee Omar Artan, who was denied entry to the United States despite being selected for World Cup duties, has further fueled criticism from football federations and human rights advocates.
The growing number of visa disputes is creating a broader challenge for the first World Cup to be jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. Analysts warn that tensions between national border policies and FIFA's commitment to universal participation could become a major issue throughout the tournament. As affected delegations seek clarification and possible appeals, the controversy is likely to remain a significant talking point both on and off the pitch.
Comments
Sign in with Google to comment.